Peter Christopher Lomtevas

Peter Lomtevas is a licensed family law attorney specializing in divorce, child support, and child custody cases formerly in Schenectady and the New York Capitol region. A graduate of The Kew Forest School, Hofstra, and Touro College Law Center, Peter is also a member of the New York State Bar Association. Education • The Kew Forest School, 1966 - 1978 • Hofstra University, 1978 - 1981 • Touro College Law Center, 1993 - 1996 Civilian Awards • Distinguished Public Service Award, 2006: Brooklyn Borough President • Businessman of the Year, 2006: National Republican Congressional Committee • Conspicuous Service Medal, November 15, 2007: Serphin Maltese Admissions • US Supreme Court • US Court of Claims • US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces • US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit • US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit • US District Court, Northern District Florida • US District Court, Eastern District New York • US District Court, Southern District New York • Georgia (Inactive) • New York • Pennsylvania • Texas. Airborne School, Fort Benning, Georgia, 1981 • Infantry Officer Basic Course, 1982 • Infantry Mortar Platoon Officer Course, Fort Benning, Georgia, 1982 • US Army Berlin Brigade July, 1982 - May, 1985 • Infantry Officer Advanced Course, Fort Benning, Georgia, 1985 • Fort Dix, October 2, 1985 - March 23, 1989 • Combined Arms Services Staff School, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, 1987 • The University of Delaware Army ROTC, August 14, 1989 - July 1, 1993 • Air Assault School, Fort Belvoir, Maryland, 1991 Military Career and Achievements Airborne School, Fort Benning, Georgia, 1981 Infantry Officer Basic Course, 1982 Infantry Mortar Platoon Officer Course, Fort Benning, Georgia, 1982 US Army Berlin Brigade July, 1982 - May, 1985 Infantry Officer Advanced Course, Fort Benning, Georgia, 1985 Fort Dix, October 2, 1985 - March 23, 1989.

• Wrongful Conviction
• Municipal Liability

• Free Consultation
• Credit Cards Accepted
  Visa, Mastercard, American Express and Discover
• Rates, Retainers and Additional Information
  Fixed fees for most cases. An hourly fee of $300 is available. Pro hac vice representation slightly more.

EDNY/SDNY

Since 2001

Georgia

Since 2005

New York

Since 2000

Pennsylvania

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

ID Number: 330131

Since 2021

Texas

State Bar of Texas

ID Number: 24134031

Since 2023

2nd Circuit

Since 2001

D.C. Circuit

Since 2006

U.S. Supreme Court

Since 2006

Owner

Peter C. Lomtevas, Esq., P.C.

2004 - Current

Independently owned and family operated family law office specializing in child custody, child support, divorces, post judgment and appellate practice. Also specializing in criminal defense.

Touro College

J.D. (1996)

Distinguished Public Service Award

Brooklyn Borough President

2006

Texas State Bar  # 24134031

Member

2023 - Current

New York State Bar  # 3046414

Member

2000 - Current

Q. How can I divorce my German spouse, married in the US, living abroad?

April 4, 2025

A: The asker can file in New York if he has New York residency (not clear how many years are needed because we do not know how long the wife lived in New York if she did at all). The summons and complaint is served via an oversees process service company that will run into some money for translation and delivery.

Then, the wife can appear and participate in the case in New York.

Q. Can I gain legal rights to a child I've raised, not biologically mine, in NY?

April 1, 2025

A: While we are prohibited from dispensing legal advice given the anonymous nature of this web site and the lack of knowledge of the facts, some situations are too important for us to stay silent.

In general terms, New York as well as a majority of the states of the United States push for biological parents to raise their children. That is the best protection a child can have: two parents who love their child. However, life's maladies easily lead to failures, and children are orphaned (separated from their biological parents) for any among uncounted reasons.

Grandparents have a second-in-line chance pursuant to New York's Domestic Relations Law (DRL) §§240 and 72 to obtain visitation and custody of a grandchild. In some circumstances, an extended disruption can consist of a father who moved away and a mother is either dead or also walked away. A provision in DRL §72.2.(b) is available for a petition in family court or a special proceeding in Supreme Court:

"(b) For the purposes of this section “extended disruption of custody” shall include, but not be limited to, a prolonged separation of the respondent parent and the child for at least twenty-four continuous months during which the parent voluntarily relinquished care and control of the child and the child resided in the household of the petitioner grandparent or grandparents, provided, however, that the court may find that extraordinary circumstances exist should the prolonged separation have lasted for less than twenty-four months."

This provision may be of enormous value to the asker who appears not to be a grandparent but rather a friend to keep the child safe, fed, and nurtured so as to grow up. A foster care alternative hosted by government would be the absolute last option. An attorney will also prove to be invaluable because practicing attorneys know how to assemble the documents, file them, serve them, and act on them in court. The court's process is not a do-it-yourself project as a child's future is involved.

However, as a point to remember, if the biological parents remain under wraps and do not claim their child, a possible course of action is for the asker to do nothing and let time accumulate. Once either parent moves for custody in a court, then the asker can respond with the above quoted statutory authority and then obtain an order of the child's custody.

Knee jerk court usage is ill advised. Allow the adversary to expose himself/herself and then respond. The results may be satisfying. ... Read More

Q. In NY, does non-cooperation with ACD conditions result in arrest if the order is 'by consent'? Why is it enforceable?

March 27, 2025

A: Well, just as a breach of any contract carries legal consequences, the failure of a consenting parent to abide by an agreement to go through post judgment activities also carries legal consequences. "Consent" does not mean immunity from complying with cooperating with supervision visits, ensuring her child receives mental health treatment, and maintaining suitable housing.

Any failure is sufficient to vacate the ACD and restore the matter to the court's calendar for more sardonic results. That is how the apparatus is set up. Compliance with government commands must take place.