Matthew Morris

Matthew Morris

I focus my practice exclusively on advising nonprofit organizations.
  • Business Law
  • Indiana
Badges
Claimed Lawyer ProfileQ&ASocial MediaResponsive Law
Biography

M.G. Morris Law focuses on one thing: helping nonprofits, their donors, and benefit corporations do more good in the world by preventing and solving their legal problems.

I grew up in the Midwest. After college I flew helicopters in the Navy for ten years before going to law school. I still serve my "one weekend a month" in Fort Worth, Texas. After law school and an appellate clerkship in Indiana, I joined an Indianapolis law firm helping employers navigate employment issues. During an unexpected one-year detour to Afghanistan, I provided advice to the Afghan government on anti-corruption efforts.

After coming home, I served for 11 years as an Assistant United States Attorney, trying cases before juries and arguing appeals. But my favorite part of being a prosecutor was building relationships with my clients, crime victims' advocates, and organizations that advocate for the powerless. After several years of thinking about ways that the legal industry can serve civil society better, I heard the question, "what would you do if you weren't afraid?"

The answer to that question, for me, was to establish a new kind of law firm. M.G. Morris Law, P.C., is a (mostly) virtual and (mostly) paperless firm. We're not small, we're agile: there is no committee that needs to approve taking on new clients or new matters. And using the newest law firm practice management technology, I can scale my efforts in ways that traditional legal practice might not. Inspired by the example of nonprofit lawyers in other states, I have adopted new billing models that move away from the billable hour model and focus on more predictable and cost-effective billing, including subscription services and flat fees, to remove barriers to both value and communication. The billable hour model rewards inefficiency (by me) and discourages communication (by you).

In our personal philanthropic life, my wife Amy and I are involved in animal rescue, blood cancer research, and disaster response.

Practice Area
    Business Law
    Business Contracts, Business Dissolution, Business Finance, Business Formation, Mergers & Acquisitions, Partnership & Shareholder Disputes
Additional Practice Area
  • Nonprofits and exempt organizations
Fees
  • Rates, Retainers and Additional Information
    Most services are offered under either a low, predictable monthly subscription for “outside general counsel” services, or flat fees for “outside counsel” services.
Jurisdictions Admitted to Practice
Indiana
Indiana Supreme Court
ID Number: 26510-29
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
7th Circuit
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
9th Circuit
Placeholder image for jurisdictions.
Languages
  • English: Spoken, Written
  • Spanish: Written
Professional Experience
Founder and Principal
M.G. Morris Law
- Current
I help nonprofits and their donors avoid, minimize, and respond to legal issues so that they can do more good in the world by focusing on their missions.
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Department of Justice
-
Advisor
NATO Training Mission Afghanistan
-
Associate
Baker and Daniels LLP
-
Law clerk to the Hon. Michael S. Kanne
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
-
Education
University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
J.D. (2006)
-
Honors: Cum laude
University of Michigan - Ann Arbor Logo
Georgetown University
B.S.F.S. (1993) | International Politics
-
Georgetown University Logo
Awards
A Night to Honor Service
Federal Bar Association
Professional Associations
Indiana State Bar  # 26510-29
Member
Current
Placeholder image for professional associations.
Publications
Articles & Publications
Treatment by Chiropractors under the Family Medical Leave Act
Indiana Employment Law Letter
Politics and Work, Part 1: Private Employers
Politics and Work, Part 2: Public Employers
Indiana Employment Law Letter
E-verify With Caution
Indiana Employment Law Letter
Hiding Amongst a Crowd and the Illegality of Deceptive Lighting
Naval Law Review
The Executive Role in Culturing Export Control Compliance
Michigan Law Review
Speaking Engagements
Use of Accomplice Witnesses in Criminal Investigations and Prosecutions, Basic Criminal Trial Advocacy Seminar
United States Department of Justice National Advocacy Center
A survey of the particular difficulties of using criminal accomplices in the investigation and trial of criminal cases.
Effect of Child Pornography Trafficking on Victims, Crimes Against Children, Teens and Women
California State Bar
Employment Document Retention Periods, Employment Records, Retention, Retrieval, and Destruction
Employment Law Institute
Use of Accomplice Witnesses in Criminal Investigations and Prosecutions, Basic Criminal Trial Advocacy Seminar
United States Department of Justice National Advocacy Center
Websites & Blogs
Website
The Firm's Website
Legal Answers
14 Questions Answered
Q. Can an 'adminstratively dissolved' non profit continue to make and enforce contracts?
A: A short answer is "no and yes." Here's a longer answer: Any corporation in Kansas, including a nonprofit corporation, will generally lose their ability to engage in the purpose for which they were formed once they have been administratively dissolved. That's the "no" part of the answer. But, there are two exceptions, and they are the "yes" part of the answer. First, the corporation will automatically remain in existence for "the term of three years ... or for such longer period as the district court in its discretion shall direct" in order "gradually to settle and close their business, to dispose of and convey their property, to discharge their liabilities, but not for the purpose of continuing the business for which the corporation was organized." Collecting new dues from an owner who did not move in until more than 10 years after the organization was dissolved does not likely fall into that exception, but there is a (very) slim chance this "wind-up" period is in play. Second, a corporation, including a nonprofit corporation, can apply for reinstatement by catching up with any administrative deficiencies that caused the Secretary of State to dissolve it to begin with. So, for example, if a corporation was dissolved for failing to file annual reports, they can be reinstated by filing the missing reports and paying past-due fees. Once the nonprofit has done that, they are not only back in business, but anything that they did during the time that they were dissolved is given full force and effect. The relevant law is Kansas Statute Annotate Chapter 17, Article 70, Section 17-7002. "Upon the filing of the [reinstatement] certificate ... the corporation shall be renewed or reinstated with the same force and effect as if its articles of incorporation or authority to engage in business had not been forfeited or void pursuant to this code or had not expired by limitation." That reinstatement "shall validate all contracts, acts, matters and things made, done and performed within the scope of its articles of incorporation or authority to engage in business by the corporation, its officers and agents during the time when its articles of incorporation or authority to engage in business was forfeited or void pursuant to this code, or after their expiration by limitation, with the same force and effect and to all intents and purposes as if the articles of incorporation had at all times remained in full force and effect." So that's the big "yes" part of "no and yes." Even if the nonprofit is dissolved (for now) it takes very little for the organization to achieve reinstatement and have all their actions retroactively made valid.
Q. Does a president of a condo association have the right to hire and fire employees without board approval?
A: Like almost any good legal question, the answer is "it depends." Generally, an individual person can be given the ability to hire and fire employees without calling for a board vote. But a more specific answer is that you should look at your association's bylaws. Under Maryland law, the "council of unit owners" has ultimate responsibility for conducting the affairs of the condominium. But the council is permitted to delegate its powers to a board of directors or officers. And there are required to be bylaws: "the administration of every condominium shall be governed by bylaws which shall be recorded with the declaration." There are some things that are required to be in your bylaws, including: "whether, and to what extent, the duties of the council of unit owners may be delegated to a board of directors, manager, or otherwise, and specifying the powers, manner of selection, and removal of them." In addition, the bylaws "may" also include "any other provision regarding the management and operation of the condominium." So, in Maryland you have the "council of unit owners" who represent the largest group and includes all unit owners. But you generally don't want every decision to be something that the entire council votes on. Can you imagine if all of the owners had to assemble (with a quorum) to vote on every decision that affected the association? So your bylaws set out the categories of things that are delegated from the council of unit owners and to the board and to the officers. Many such organizations will specify that the board has to vote to make a decision to hire and fire certain key employees, but that other minor positions can be hired and fired by some other person, perhaps (in your case) the president. So, look to your bylaws for the answer to whether, in your case, the president has been delegated the authority to hire and fire. For that matter, look to your bylaws to see whether the board of directors has been delegated that authority. Hopefully not, but it's always possible that your bylaws are missing something that gives that authority to somebody. In that case, the authority to hire and fire might still be sitting with the council, the entire slate of unit owners.
Q. Former board member stole intellectual property. What can I do?
A: The devil is going to be in the details on this, and there are probably dozens of follow-up questions that a nonprofit attorney (which I am) or an intellectual property attorney (which I am not) would ask you. But here are some thoughts. This type of situation often arises when two or more groups or factions both claim to be the person or people who can act on behalf of the organization. Is that what is going on? If so, I would want to take a long look at the organization's bylaws and ask a lot of questions about what has happened to cause this person to go from being a board member sometime in the past to being a former board member now. And do they believe (or say) that they are still authorized to act on behalf of the organization as a board member? Or would they say that they are just pursuing a similar mission now that they have moved on. The approach to take would depend on some of these questions. You say that the person is using the organization's name for personal use. In what way? The worst version of that would be somebody going out and soliciting charitable donations in the name of your organization and diverting the donations to their personal bank account. If that is what seems to be happening, the Missouri Attorney General's Office charity and nonprofit organization section is a good place to file a complaint. There is a link and a phone number on the AG's website. Your issue about access to the domain name involves different questions. How did they do that? Access to the domain name is largely a matter of contract law between the domain registrar and whoever registered the domain name. Did the organization register the domain name, or did a well-intentioned supporter register the domain and now there's a dispute about should be allowed to use it? We would want to talk about the question above: is this a board faction dispute? Beyond the question of a faction issue, plenty of organizations (non-profit and for-profit alike) become victims of some form of domain hijacking. You have used the term "intellectual property" here, and if we're talking about the domain name it may or may not be intellectual property. And the extent of your intellectual property rights in that name will affect things like whether you've taken certain steps to protect that IP. We'd have to chat. Finally, any other intellectual property? Are we talking about copyrighted materials that have been taken and are being used by somebody other then the copyright holder? Or are these trademarks that are being infringed? Depending on what type of IP and how it is potentially being infringed, next steps might include a "DMCA takedown" request or perhaps a lawsuit.
View More Answers
Contact & Map
M.G. Morris Law, P.C.
55 Monument Circle
Seventh Floor
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Telephone: (317) 296-4584
Monday: 8 AM - 5 PM (Today)
Tuesday: 8 AM - 5 PM
Wednesday: 8 AM - 5 PM
Thursday: 8 AM - 5 PM
Friday: 8 AM - 5 PM
Saturday: Closed
Sunday: Closed
Notice: By appointment.